AAG: Your website, http://www.nucleonicenergy.com, talks briefly about your background & PhD. Can you provide us with a bit more depth on your educational experience, and how this led to the development of your theory?
Winfield: My book will speak for itself regarding my education [although I have tried to keep the language simple]. I do not have a PhD. I didn’t quite get there when I went to the University of B.C. due to funds. The degree that I have is Doctor of Metaphysical Science from a University in California. It is recognized in that state. I used some of my book as a thesis for this after taking their courses. It was the last chapter in my book in which I used science to confirm many of the metaphysical phenomena. My scientific education has been spread over a lifetime and based on my book I believe that I have surpassed most of the present day scientists.
AAG: For those in the audience who might believe that you're only doing theoretical research, I'd also like to touch on your hands-on work in industry & as an experimentalist. You've done work in the mining & construction industries, and run several companies. Can you elaborate a bit for us?
Winfield: In my early years I spent seven years in the mining promotion and exploration field including hard rock mining and diamond drilling. I have had several inventions on the market in the past such as an electronic timer that converts to the amount of money owing for poolrooms, a superior shoring jack which I manufactured for the construction industry with 16 employees and some springless overhead doors which I manufactured for fifteen years. I also manufactured other construction products with 15 employees.
AAG: Another interesting tidbit from your website is a lengthy biographical reference to Dr. Hans Nieper. From reading the article, it seems obvious that his work affected your own views, and I'm hoping you could provide some insight on why Nieper's research is important?
Winfield: I was not referring to Dr. Nieper’s work. I was just showing his importance in the scientific field and that he was supporting me.
AAG: I guess to touch on a more simplistic concept, while learning about your theory online, I noticed a reference to the concept of "tapping the angular momentum of the nucleus of an atom". How does this relate to gravity-modification, though?
Winfield: I have discussed this at the beginning. Since I have shown that all particles are vortexes and that there are vortexes within vortexes, from the subatomic to the Universe itself, the angular momentum therein is the source of the energy that drives one body towards another one, or towards each other, which is known as gravity.
AAG: As you may know, the topic of Torsion-Theory has recently resurfaced with some interesting new connections between Tesla, Einstein, and the Hutchison-Effect. In that context, hearing you talk about "controlling the spin-axis of the nucleon" sounds remarkably similar to the idea of "spin-fields" for controlling gravitation in the Torsion-Theory models. Given Einstein's apparent belief that spin may in fact have been a fundamental 5th-dimensional force, do you think that your theory is reinforcing his views, or is this simply a case of coincidence?
Winfield: It is a case of coincidence. I do not regard nucleonic force as a fifth dimensional force. Maybe a part of his theory reinforces my views?
AAG: As I understand things, Hutchison typically uses an array of RF-amplifiers, Tesla-Coils, and Van De Graaf generators to produce his levitation effects. In your model, how do these high-voltage electrostatic devices modify spin to create antigravity-effects?
Winfield:I am not about to publicize any levitation or equipment at this time. I have the moral obligation to my shareholders to keep most of the details confidential. I will say this much -- an important aspect of the development of this technology is control. The levitation must take place at the time that one flicks on the switch, not after an hour or several hours of fooling around. I have accomplished this with small objects, every time, of any material. I have been waiting for further financing to purchase some modern equipment that will enable me to do the same with larger objects. Then there is further development after that. In the meantime I have perfected my theory...
Winfield: I lent John Hutchison a piece of equipment in 1981 to go with his existing tools to duplicate Tesla's transmission of electricity through the air. John subsequently phoned and said that he had operated all the equipment together and was very surprised that a heavy bar of plastic had flopped over. It was hard for him to believe until further experiments verified it.
AAG: Speaking of Hutchison, I should note the statement on your site that you were actually the person who recommended the experimental setup that eventually led to his levitation-effects. Can you tell me a bit about the early days, and how Alex Pezarro and John Hutchison got involved with your research?
Winfield: John met me at one of my lectures. After the lecture he told me that he had equipment to try to duplicate Tesla’s transmission of electricity through the air. Recognizing that coupled with my Van de Graaf generator, it might be what I needed for levitation. I asked him if he would work with me towards this goal. He agreed and I lent him my Van de Graaf. It worked.
AAG: You've talked about Hutchison attending one of your early lectures, and I thought it would be fascinating to learn a bit more about these events. Can you give us a bit more detail on the lectures that you used to deliver, especially in terms of the standard "where, when, who" and how they were received by the public?
Winfield: When I lectured it was usually a summary of my theoretical work together with scientific verification of some of the metaphysical phenomena. The public was quite attentive. Van De Graaf: Another component used by Hutchison, possibly as a DC field-bias offset.
AAG: Apparently Hutchison's not the only person with levitation-effects -- you've talked about a levitating tuna-can. Can you describe for us a bit about your own levitation experiments, and whether you'd ever be open to releasing photos or video of these experiments to the public?
Winfield: I have a couple of demonstrations on additions on my website with some preamble necessary to view them as they are not as clear as I would have wished. They were only with a small Van de Graaf just to prove that the partial levitation [weight loss on a scale] could be done practically instantaneously after flipping the switch. The tuna can was John’s challenge to me. He wanted me to also show all my equipment. I’m not about to divulge this although my electronic engineer has built some remarkable equipment. However, we still need about $25,000 worth of additional solid state equipment and working capital. I’m hoping that someone out there will work with my federally incorporated company to provide it.
AAG: I recently had the opportunity to visit Hutchison's residence, and learned about a variety of anomalous effects that he's documented in addition to levitation -- including the jellification of metals, objects becoming reportedly invisible, and numerous other anomalies. Have you seen any of these other anomalous effects in your own research, and can your theory offer any insight into how to explain them?
Winfield: With the new equipment I probably will but I have to wait for the funding. The major part are more powerful power supplies in solid state weighing 42 lbs. each. They need to be solid state for precision. When dealing with nucleons there is no room for variable voltage as is put out by vacuum tube technology. That is why it sometimes took hours for John to get something to happen. Also, I want to build a larger and new kind of Van de Graaf generator. The bending and merging, which I saw, was due to the changing angles of the union between atoms which, in turn, were due to a changing frequency. If anything became invisible, it would have been because the frequency was above or below light frequency on which our eyes operate.
AAG: Since you're working with your own set of equipment, I'd be remiss not to ask at least a bit about the equipment & lab setup that you're using to generate effects, and whether you've ever seen any new effects not reported by the Hutchison, Hathaway, Pezzaro team?
Winfield: I am not going to divulge much about our equipment. Much of it is proprietary.
AAG: I think that most people would consider these amazing effects to be validation enough for your theory, but I'd also like to ask about whether it makes predictions that can be confirmed in mainstream science, such as possibly by astronomical, cosmological, or other disciplines?
Winfield: My book is about much more than just levitation and I have most of it confirmed by mathematics [purposely not much is past algebra]. I believe that some of it could be confirmed through astronomy and through testing on long space flights.
AAG: Like yourself, a large part of our audience are interested in doing experiments on their own. Can you suggest any experiments that the average person can build, or is the equipment setup simply too complex for even small-scale experimentation?
Winfield: I cannot suggest any experiments without giving away too much information.
AAG: Well, in addition to your website, I'd also like to talk about your books -- what have you written, and where can people buy them to learn more about your research?
Winfield: My book “The Science of Actuality” is 240 pages each 8 ½” X 14”. There are many scientific breakthroughs. Among other things I have replaced Newton’s gravitation formula by eliminating G, the gravitational constant, which is not accurate, extended Kepler’s formula, proved the basis of the theory of relativity to be wrong by using the mind experiment of the boxcar as an example. It is said that the whole subject of theoretical Relativity is simply the application of the Lorentz transformation which Einstein used and called the relativistic factor. The boxcar mind experiment was supposed to support the idea of this factor but now it disproves it. I’ve shown that light speed can be variable, how the galaxy and solar system was formed from an interaction of standing waves and discovered a new cosmic principle that links the spin of a body to its orbital path curvature. For an example, I calculated the spin of the Earth from its orbital data. This eliminates the need for a curved space. A few other things are on my website under my name. Also click on order book on how to order the book. The International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, [a division of the United Nations and an international atomic energy agency] thought enough of my book to place it in their library “for the benefit of their visitors”
Dr. Mel Winfield is an independent inventor from British Columbia, Canada. He holds a Doctorate in Metaphysical Sciences from the University of California, and serves as the founder of Winfield Industries, Northwest Engineering Ltd., and Winfield Invention & Research, Ltd. You can visit Winfield’s site online at the following URL: http://www.nucleonicenergy.com
2008: Mel will be a guest on a TV program this year, to be shown on global and the mystery channel, explaining what Nucleonic Energy is and how it can benefit society. He'll discuss his book "The Science of Actuality".
February 28, 2005: Mel was a guest on Mysteries of the Mind explaining what Nucleonic Energy is and how it can benefit society. He discussed his book "The Science of Actuality".
February 22, 2005: Mel was a guest on the Jack Landman Show.
February 20, 2005: Mel was a guest on the Rob McConnell Show.
December 20, 2004: Mel was a guest on the Lou Gentile Show.
NOTE - To listen to most Internet radio broadcasts, you need to have to have Windows Media Player installed. You can download and install it from this location: Download Windows Media Player
Copyright © 1977-2015 Mel Winfield. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 1977-2015 Mel Winfield. All rights reserved.